Close

Request A Callback

If you would like one of our representatives to give you a call to discuss your situation in complete confidence, please enter your details below and someone will call you as soon as possible.

[[[["field5","not_equal_to","I consent for my data to be used by Mediatelegal to process my enquiry."]],[[]],"and"]]
1
Your Name
Phone Number
Previous
Next

DSN v Blackpool Football Club – case review

This article is by Cook Legal Ltd. It reviews the recent case of DSN v Blackpool Football Club Ltd. This is a case where the judgment emphasis the danger of refusing to mediate.


The case involved allegations of sexual abuse. In DSN V Blackpool Football Club Ltd the football club robustly defended the case. At the trial on 13th March 2020, the Claimant succeeded. The Defendants were vicariously liable and ordered to pay damages of just under £19,750.00. A Part 36 offer of £10,000 had been made on 2nd December 2019.

Griffiths J added 10% to the award plus enhanced interest as the Claimant had beaten his own Part 36 offer. The judge also awarded costs on the indemnity basis from the date of expiry of the Part 36 offer pursuant to CPR 36.14 (4) (b).

The claimants applied for an order that the Defendants pay the whole of their costs on the indemnity basis because they had unreasonable failed to engage in ADR.

A directions order of 30th October 2018 included the following –

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
At all stages the parties must consider settling this litigation by any means of Alternative Dispute Resolution (including Mediation); any party not engaging in any such means proposed by another must serve a witness statement giving reasons within 21 days of that proposal; such witness statement must not be shown to the trial judge until questions of costs arise.”

On 30th October 2019 the claimant’s solicitors wrote to invite settlement negotiations. The defendants refused. The solicitors filed a statement which stated –

“Having considered all of the available evidence, the defendant continues to believe that it has a strong defence to this claim and stands by the contents of its Defence dated 10 May 2018. In the circumstances I respectfully submit that no purpose would be served by any form of ADR.”

In other words, they refused to engage in any ADR because they felt that they had a strong defence. This argument was rejected. This was not an adequate reason for refusing to engage –

“No defence, however strong, by itself justifies a failure to engage in any kind of alternative dispute resolution. Experience has shown that disputes may often be resolved in a way satisfactory to all parties, including parties who find themselves able to resolve claims against them which they consider not to be well founded. Settlement allows solutions which are potentially limitless in their ingenuity and flexibility, and they do not necessarily require any admission of liability, or even a payment of money.”

The judge noted that, as it turned out, they did not have a strong defence – they lost.
He refused to order the defendants to pay the whole of the costs on the indemnity basis. He ordered to pay the costs on that basis from 1st December 2018 i.e. the day following one month after the 30th October directions order.

The message is clear. If there is a direction for the parties to consider ADR there must be a realistic consideration. It is not enough for either party to declare that they have such a strong case that they do not see the point.

The consequences of such refusals can be very expensive.


Cook Legal Ltd is a specialist costs firm offering a nationwide service.

The judgment in DSN v Blackpool Football Club Ltd is one of many judgments where it is clear that ADR and mediation should have been considered thoroughly by the parties. If it isn’t then there is a real risk that costs consequences could follow.

Mediatelegal is a Civil Mediation Council Registered Mediation Provider. Our expert mediators can mediate across the UK and beyond either in person or via remote methods.

We charge one of 3 fixed fees:-

Length Format Fee per party
2 hour mediation In person / remote £200 + VAT
4 hour mediation In person / remote £600 + VAT
8 hour mediation In person / remote £1000 + VAT

Our Mediators

Mediatelegal has several specialist cost mediators. You can see what sectors each mediator is most active in, and download their CV, here.

Our service

As part of our fixed fee, we will take care of all of the admin of arranging a mediation on behalf of your fee earners.

We will contact the other side & propose mediation formally on your behalf. We can arrange the date, venue, and mediator for you – leaving your fee earners and support staff free to do more productive tasks. If the other party declines or ignores our efforts, we will revert to you within 14 days with formal confirmation that mediation was offered and has not been accepted. This can later be shown to the court when costs are discussed.

Please contact us on 0151 363 3977 or help@mediatelegal.co.uk

Posted in Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Did you know?

Workplace disputes will affect profitability and performance. Use mediation to resolve disputes swiftly.

The longer a dispute continues in the workplace, the more dramatic the effect on those working in or around it.

Conflict between employees can spread throughout the workforce, affecting morale and performance, if untreated.

A 2008 CIPD survey found that 51% of respondents use an external mediator to resolve people problems and conflict.

A 2008 CIPD survey found that 75% of mediations were initiated by HR departments.

If you express your anger you will start an argument; if you explain your anger you will start a discussion.

In 2016 mediation will have saved UK businesses £3 billion in wasted management time & productivity, damaged relationships, & legal fees.

Ignoring ‘mega-cases’ the total value of mediated disputes in the UK each year is £11.5 billion.

Since 1990, the total value of mediated cases in England & Wales is £110 billion.

CEO of regional Charity – “We have had cause to use Mediatelegal recently and I was delighted with their service. the mediator was patient during a very emotional and somewhat difficult situation but handled it beautifully. We saved a significant amount of money and would highly recommend this organisation to anyone wishing to avoid costly legal bills.”

Linda Lavery, The HR Dept: “I cannot recommend them highly enough. They were brought in to resolve a complex dispute which had continued for months with no resolution. The process was managed from start to finish by Mediatelegal and with their expertise and impartiality, the conflict was resolved amicably for all parties in just 1 day. The management time and money that has been saved is incalculable.”

According to the CEDR 2018 audit, 89% of mediations settle successfully on the day or shortly afterwards.

You are entitled to recover certain expenses incurred when attending a SEND mediation session.

An individual might potentially require an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP until they reach the age of 25.

| Website designed & hosted by Cyberfrog Design
Mediatelegal is a trading style of Why Mediate Ltd (Company Reg No. 09148466)
Cookies | Terms & Conditions